Extremists re marketed as terrorists???


This is a fact that it is an impossibility to get everyone to agree on any single issue, let alone on all issues.

Each person is unique, has been socially conditioned differently and has different experience and hence has an opinion as valid as yours or mine if it is based on “fact” or in truth!

However they no person has authority to knowingly cause another creation harm as was “proven” in the Legal analysis slide presentation, and hence any member knowingly causing harm must be held responsible and make good the harm caused. Only the affected people can determine if “justice” was served.


Lawfully we each can freely travel the planet without causing harm for our needs of survival. Lawfully we cannot stop another meeting their needs of survival unless it threatens our needs for survival. This truth was best stated in the Declaration of Independence 1776

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God (Replace with creation my suggested change) entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

We create a social system by delegating some of our authority and retain the power to change it when it does not perform.

“Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right (RESPONSIBILITY my suggested change) of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.  (Delete rest of paragraph my suggested change)

I suggest you read the list of grievances as most apply equally today (Transcript of the Declaration of Independence 1776)!


No one has the “right” to stop another from meeting their needs of survival unless in self defence of their own right of survival.

So once your needs of survival are met you have no “right” to stop another meeting their needs of survival.



So as a society how can we define “consent” for man made laws?

The normal distribution curve represents nature and has 10% extremists at each side. Within that 10% is another bell curve, and again within the same, until you get down to the individual observation.  This is a pictorial representation of the fractal nature of creation shown below.

Labeled fractal Distribution Curve

From this natural behaviour I would suggest a minimum 90% is deemed to be consensus for all decisions made by society, as well as for legal decisions with one major change being that of accountability. People must stand by there decisions and held accountable for their views by the public i.e. no secret deliberations or meetings – once the decision has been made it is put into the public record (eg using modern technology they can be recorded and after announcement of decision put on “youtube”. No one must be able to hide from their responsibility to society!